This reel is part of one of our Specialty Collections. Online viewing or downloads of low-res versions for offline viewing will be available for only more day, though. Online viewing or downloads of low-res versions for offline viewing has now expired, though, and cannot be viewed online. "Pro" account holders can download a low-res version without audio for offline viewing.
Sign up for a "Pro" account to download this footage.
This reel is currently not available for online viewing.
Sorry, this video is temporarily unavailable for online viewing or download. Please try again later.
Restricted Material
Access to this reel with audio is restricted. It will be available for only more day.
Access to this reel with audio has expired.
01:00:00 0.47 |
Color Bars
|
01:01:18 78.77 |
Reel opens, No Audio Host Robert Lipsyte caught with his mouth wide open and throwing his hands up in the air. with overlay stating "Oh Goodie, The Eleventh hour is over!!!
|
01:01:27 87.14 |
Strange Slate: close up of open mouth, flashing in and out, The Eleventh Hour Show #373. Facing Black History (Black Art) Running time 30:45; Record Date: 14 June
|
01:01:35 95.92 |
Blank
|
01:01:38 98.12 |
Funding for show by Announcer. Charitable orgs overlay The Eleventh Hour graphic.
|
01:02:11 131.54 |
Show Opener
|
01:02:18 138.59 |
Host Robert Lipsyte standing in the Brooklyn Museum in front of a huge realist painting depicting turn of the century African American people. He talks to viewers about tonight's program, the racial stereotypes depicting minstrels, slaves and picaninny watermelon eaters. "Should they be swept into the dust bin of history or should we study them for clues as to how art has shaped our attitudes?"
|
01:02:26 146.88 |
Lipsyte welcomes viewers, announces the show and introduces himself.
|
01:02:36 156.77 |
Fade to blank.
|
01:02:37 157.26 |
Montage of the the different paintings displayed at the "Facing History" exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum depicting African American life, realism and caricatures.
|
01:02:52 172.61 |
Close up on painting of a young Black boy's face with overlay "Facing History"
|
01:02:55 175.22 |
Slate: Facing History
|
01:02:58 178.57 |
Pan down on large museum exhibition sign on wall,"Facing History The Black Image in American Art 1710-1940". A young Black woman introducing herself to unseen folk as the tour guide.
|
01:03:12 192.48 |
High School students filing in to the Brooklyn Museum, passing by the large Facing History sign on the wall.
|
01:03:17 197.47 |
Group of mostly black high schoolers in museum studying large painting on wall. Tour guide explains the painting and what it represents.
|
01:03:28 208.21 |
Sonnet Takahisa, Educator from the Brooklyn Museum, speaking with unseen unknown interviewer in the museum about the relevancy of the paintings with relation of what's currently going on in New York City.
|
01:03:36 216.38 |
Framed paintings from the show depicting the visual imagery which helps to perpetuate the stereotyping. Takahisa, still talking, states she feels that high schoolers seeing the imagery helps them understand, as it relates to what is going on in their lives around them today.
|
01:03:57 237.97 |
Group of high schoolers gathered in museum studying the large paintings.
|
01:04:04 244.31 |
Z'in on and focus on a particular painting which depicts a white artist's portrayal of African Americans - Blacks are marginal reflecting the white artists view of master and slave - narratrion by Robert Lipsyte
|
01:04:16 255.98 |
Z'in on other paintings shown which verge on caricatures, with the same type of imagery, the marginal Black person.
|
01:04:25 265.35 |
In the same exhibit, a montage of paintings of more dignified and beautiful portrayals of African American life
|
01:04:32 272.46 |
African American man in a wheelchair - the show's curator, Guy C. McElroy, wheels himself slowly up to a painting
|
01:04:41 281.03 |
Pan in on a beautiful painting depicting an African American family clinging to the roof of their flooded home in a storm. Narration by McElroy.
|
01:04:45 285.46 |
McElroy close up talking with unseen unknown interviewer in the museum at the Facing History Exhibit.
|
01:04:59 299.76 |
McElroy describes the painting on the wall of, "The Bones Player" by the 19th Century Painter, William Sidney Mount. He states, the painting is of an attractive talented Black man which the artist portrayed in a sympathetic manner, however, he is a Bones Player which depicts him as a Minstrel, an entertainer.
|
01:05:26 326.67 |
Pan up and out on a caricature of two Black banjo players
|
01:05:57 357.14 |
McElroy continues to say - the painting of The Bones Player is not just simply a portrait of an attractive man, but a portrait of a person who fits into society a certain way, according to the ideas of William Sidney Mount.
|
01:06:03 363.64 |
Painting on the wall in gold frame named, "the Minstrel Show".
|
01:06:07 367.69 |
Back with the high schoolers and Sonnet Takahisa explaining the painting and what it represents.
|
01:06:19 379.41 |
Pan the group of Black high schoolers studying the exhibit. High School girl in the group attempts to interpret the painting.
|
01:06:31 391.85 |
Pan across a painting of particularly weird images of Black men, sort of caricatures, with their mouths open, looking kind of scared.
|
01:06:42 402.84 |
Sonnet Takhisa, Museum Educator explains that the images are a reflection of a particular period, artist or area.
|
01:06:56 416.17 |
Robert Lipsyte narrates about the exhibit, Facing History originated in the Corchoran Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. as newspapers articles from the New York Times are displayed: "Images of Blacks Refracted in a White Mirror" and "Two Centuries of Stereotypes", "A Controversial Exhibit Opens"
|
01:07:07 427.72 |
Guy C. McElroy still speaking with unseen interviewer commenting on the exhibit and stating he didn't expect it to be as controversial as it has become.
|
01:07:40 460.88 |
Jack Flam, Art Historian, speaking with unknown unseen interviewer talking about the exhibit explains in his view, it's 100% political and that the "art itself isn't really worth looking at as art"
|
01:08:11 491.87 |
Guy McElroy still speaking with interviewer, disagrees with Flam's view.
|
01:08:59 539.7 |
Close up on beautiful painting, The Market Slaves in Richmond, Virginia.
Takahisa answers boys' question barely heard, were they selling slaves there? |
01:09:08 548.53 |
High School students gathered enraptured, studying the painting, as Takahisa explains what they're looking at.
|
01:09:13 553.18 |
Close up on painting Market Slaves in Richmond, Virginia .
|
01:09:50 590.41 |
Pan out from large painting - a depiction a female slave holding a babyt being sold or auctioned off.
|
01:09:52 592.1 |
Robert Lipsyte narrates as different paintings are highlighted - a depiction of a plantation owner selling off his Mulatto son, other paintings showing escape from slavery.
|
01:10:29 629.35 |
McElroy in wheelchair at the museum still speaking with unseen interviewer speaks of some artists who creeate the argument that suggests the ability and equality of blacks.
|
01:10:43 643.41 |
Pan the dramatic and complex painting circa 1778, "Watson and the Shark" by John Singleton Copely, depicting a shark attacking a child. McElroy narrates about the Black person in the painting who is actually participating in the rescuing of Watson.
|
01:11:42 702.98 |
Pan in on two beautiful oil paintings of African American life, as Lipsyte narrates that the paintings by Thomas Aikens and Winslow Homer are believed by McElroy to have transcended stereotypes
|
01:12:20 740.12 |
Pan up on sculpture, Forever Free by Edmonia Lewis in the exhibit and other paintings by other artists, Joshua Johnson, Edward Mitchell Bannister, and others. McElroy talking about these artists were those who were exceptions in terms of having gained an opportunity to enter the mainstream as artists.
|
01:12:44 764.34 |
Close up on Forever Free as ? is heard educating the students about the Black woman artist, Edmonia Lewis.
|
01:12:53 773.43 |
Students standing around the sculpture looking very interested and engaged.
|
01:13:06 786.23 |
Montage of other sculptures in the exhibit. Lipsyte narrates a bit about McElroy and how it took him five years to put the exhibit together, then a few years ago became quadriplegic from an accident, hence the wheelchair.
|
01:13:19 799.82 |
Newspaper articles about McElroy overlay each other: "Black Images in American Art", "Guy McElroy Facing His Future"; "Disability Presented No Handicap"
|
01:13:30 810.93 |
McElroy talking with unseen interviewer about becoming a spokesperson for yet another minority and speaks about the difficulty of his disability.
|
01:15:45 945.2 |
Wide shot of exhibit room at the Brooklyn Museum, Host Robert Lipsyte sitting with three guests.
|
01:15:45 945.63 |
Host Robert Lipsyte sadly announces the unexpected death of Guy McElroy, Museum Curator and host of this program. He introduces his guests for tonight's program: Juan Sanchez, Artist; George C. Wolfe, Playwright and Author of "The Colored Museum, and Director and Adapter of the play, "Spunk"; Jessica Haggerdorn, Performance Artist and author of the novel "Dog Eaters".
|
01:16:25 985.42 |
INSERT INTERVIEW:
Robert Lipsyte 16:26 let me ask you, you've just seen this exhibit Of what use is it to us to you as an artist to to have these stereotypes rehashed, thrown back in our faces? Juan Sanchez 16:38 Well, I think it's very important for us to really have a look back and analyze a lot of the negative elements that has it's conscious and subliminal effect throughout our history, I think it's good for us to look at it face first, and analyze it and criticize it so that in a way we're not faced with doing similar mistakes Robert Lipsyte 17:02 So academic. I mean, people come into a museum, they sweep through, and they see it all over again, it almost makes credible, you know, the watermelon eaters, the pickininies, the slaves those kinds of stereotypes? Juan Sanchez 17:14 Well, I think I think what's interesting about the show is that it has that danger only if people do not react to it, and in the ways that people have been reacting to it. And therefore it creates a stage for dialogue, for discussion for disagreements for debates. And I think that the impetus of that show is with that purpose, and in that respect is very healthy, Robert Lipsyte 17:38 you do think it's healthy. George, do you think it's healthy? George C. Wolfe 17:40 I think very much. So I think the thing that's most revealing to me about the show was when I see it, it has less to say about black people more sort of say about the white people who were painting the black people. And it also has a lot to say about a romantic image that a country was trying to create for itself that had a very violent past. So that therefore, depending on their take on the black people, if they thought they were romantic novels, and they were painted that way, if they thought they were the savages, they painted that way. They were trying to create a mythology, using black people so as to substantiate this image that he wanted to project because it was not prepared. Robert Lipsyte 18:14 Do you think there's a conscious way? George C. Wolfe 18:17 Not really, I think I know more consciousness is it that that Madonna and MTV and a whole series of other things come along at the exact same time? I mean, I think there's a climate in a country that that happens and so forth, the art, especially the popular culture tends to reflect that Robert Lipsyte 18:32 what gets bought was gets sold is what's current and poorly acceptable at the moment George C. Wolfe 18:37 or the stories or the myth that is currently being sold to the populace. And you see on these walls, incredible myths that have because this country was not prepared to deal with slavery, in reality, they were not prepared to deal with a whole series of things. So we painted poetic, or we painted mockingly he painted a certain way. And then it fits into our mythology of the founding fathers and that this and that, this and this, and this is much the same way of painting happy Indians. Why are they being massacred? It makes perfect sense. Robert Lipsyte 19:05 Yeah, Jessica you come out of another culture. So seeing this, what does this say to you? Jessica Hagedorn 19:10 Well, I agree with George, it said more to me about not just the people who painted these paintings, but I was taken aback by the little commentaries on this on the side, you know, that to me was very, very interesting as well. And it took me you know, by surprise, some some of the the controversy surrounding some of these paintings, like, for example, the one with the shark, as I was looking at that I said, Well, this, this man, may or may not save this young man, you know, what's the problem? You know, what's the big to do? And then I read, I read the commentary, and I said now is is the curator who I assume wrote the commentary putting all his agenda into this too. I mean, you know, there's that going on, too, as we look back on on the show, I mean, I have to sort of all the levels that are going on |
01:20:08 1208 |
Robert Lipsyte 20:09
Well, I mean, then then we can start thinking about revisionist criticisms, too. I mean, that could be happening, as well, in the the sense that this show is going back with its own agenda, you know, into the particular kinds of art that except, but let's talk about, you know, you're all artists of minorities in this country. Does does the, do you have to fight a stereotype to begin with? Juan Sanchez 20:40 Well, interestingly enough, I think what this show really typifies, is the fact that mainstream culture, always have the control of what image they are going to perpetuate, it is very clear that how black are presented in these paintings, they're created by people who perpetuate some kind of an image of black people. And, and in a way, there's a lack of understanding of the culture or the or the circumstances. And so the fact that they could create these paintings, and have it open to the public for consumption is something that black people do not have much control of. And in that respect, many of us are trying to not only fight against that, but we're the ones that controlling our own image were the ones that are controlling our own identity, our own culture. And in that respect, by presenting ourselves in the most serious and concrete way, I feel that we're breaking down these kinds of stereotypes. Now, the question is, as to whether or not we are given the same platform, in terms of accessibility to a public to be as effective as some of these paintings have been in history? Robert Lipsyte 21:52 Because one of the things that George I think is doing very interestingly in spunk is taking those stereotypes, you know, and and giving them compassion and humanity. George C. Wolfe 22:01 Well, I don't view them as stereotypes. I think they're, they're, they're more like archetype. So I think that that that is like, Robert Lipsyte 22:07 could you explain the difference between those two words for us? George C. Wolfe 22:10 I think one has power and one doesn't mean No, no, no, very, in a very simple level. I think that what because there's Zora Neale Hurston stories and, and somebody because somebody says that does not mean that they fit into the same thing as The Little Rascals. So the fact that if Zora Neale Hurston character says that it's not the same team as buckwheat saying that, that that what she was trying to do was record a sound of a language at a time and a point. And that therefore her characters, I don't think it in any way I stereotypes what they are, it was really interesting at one point when we were rehearsing, researching color Museum. In terms of this, Kurt called out Ethel, who is who has silhouette as a man and we found these two photographs, and one was of Louise beavers, which was in a frilly little mammy thing. And then we found this photograph from the 1800s of this sharecropper, who was with the apron the differences that her costume had texture, there was a coarseness to it, there was there was a texture to it, whereas the Hollywood version had taken all of the texture out of it. So I think relating that to Zora Neale Hurston story, what's what she does is her stories and her characters have texture to it, the silhouette may be the same thing that we know of the dandy, the state, the silhouette may be the same thing of the abuse woman in the south. But what's going on inside the texture is completely different. So that therefore, I really don't, I think it's very different. And in that case, what is different from this art show is that here's a here's a here's a woman speaking about a culture that she knows, inside and out, versus a voyeuristic journey into a culture that somebody either looks at fondly romantically, or are arrogantly condescending. Robert Lipsyte 23:44 I understand what you're saying. And I think you did a lot of that in dog eaters. For me, because while I still hated some of your characters, you know, I didn't see them quite the same way that I had seen Filipinos in the press as either dictators or an oppressed person or, you know, Filipino princess. Jessica Hagedorn 24:04 Yes, yeah, I had to really think about the title, which has given me a lot of trouble, especially from my own people, because that is that's playing off a very dangerous not a stereotype, but perhaps, what can be perceived? I mean, a lot of Filipinos say, Why do you have to say that? Why do you have to bring it up? It's criminal, you know, that's not who we are. And they completely miss the point. And then other people who are not Filipino, see it and they're immediately fascinated. So I knew I was taking a big risk, and I you know, and sometimes, you just have to jump and do that. I felt comfortable with my own reasons for using it. But it's the same, that difference between archetype and stereotype. I did not see that as even necessarily a negative image. You know, and I really wanted to sort of confront that. Robert Lipsyte 24:59 Well, what about a Maybe you brought up a good point. What about archetype and stereotype in this show? Because they both must exist? Ah, I mean, because there's texture here too in some of these paintings? Jessica Hagedorn 25:07 Sure. Well, you know, I was fascinated by the painting of the young boy and the watermelon, and the commentary in that, and I said, Oh, my God, you know, the way that critic who's quoted in the commentary interpreted this painting, which I saw as this child sort of beaming, and this fruit, I mean, why the baggage that came with the way that critic interpreted it, and then the historical, looking back at it, Robert Lipsyte 25:41 the dilemma of the artist, |
01:25:43 1543.75 |
Juan Sanchez 25:44
I think one point that has to be brought up is that I think that some of the paintings really hit on the button, in terms of the mentality of, of people who are either slave masters or descendants of slave masters, I think that one particular painting, which was very obvious, was the one of Lady Liberty. on her side, where everything pertaining to culture is, is with her, and she's teaching black people, black children, culture, and that's already a perpetuation of, of black people, as well as Native American and other people of color being savage. And they have to be tamed. And they have to be trained, and they have to be educated with Western culture. George C. Wolfe 26:30 But just going back to the Romance of I mean, you know, that the people ran away from from Europe were considered barbarians by the Europeans. So what what better way to prove that you're refined than having a barbarian in your midst? So therefore, you turn him into that? So therefore, you look elegant and wonderful as you're passing down the truths? I mean, I mean, it's logical to me it's sort of depraved. But it's logical. Robert Lipsyte 26:52 Well, is there art out there that we haven't seen? That's different. I mean, that. I mean, what you use, you talked about the fact that the the minority artists is not getting the platform, that the obviously the establishment is there, aren't they that shows us the archetypes, not the stereotypes, and shows us a greater depth. Juan Sanchez 27:14 I think, first of all, throughout throughout history, there has always been artists of color, that is to say, artists who are non white. And the work that has come out throughout the years has always been a perpetuation of the truth, at least a sincere expression of one's feelings and one's attitude. And in many cases, as far as art of social political purpose is concerned, a criticism of society, I think that I myself being a Puerto Rican artist, who, who is very involved with with searching and finding my own identity within the context of society here in the United States, and even questioning the whole concept of colonialism. There are many of us who are exploring that. And the reality of it is that the mainstream art world is not really giving us that kind of the platform. I do remember one show you did on the whole Whitney biannual thing. And the fact of the matter is that there aren't, there's this usually maybe one or two, in most cases, there are no artists of color represented in that show, because first of all, most of us are not represented by galleries. And secondly, the curators don't really enter into other areas where where we do exhibit Robert Lipsyte 28:37 Let me ask you this, then why, you know, in this in this grand plays with all the publicity and foundation money is getting, wouldn't this be better used to show some of those artists of color who are not being shown rather than this historical retrospective? Juan Sanchez 28:53 Well, I think what's very interesting is that we as a society do have a tendency of being extremely revisionist. This is something that that goes back quite a number of years. And I think that we always have a tendency of always looking into the past, right now, there's a lot of movies and a lot of television programs dealing with the whole Vietnam era, but nobody wants to contend with what's going on in Central America. And in other parts of the world. Maybe 20 years later, there'll be a whole hundreds of dozens of films and TV program, concentrating on that. So the immediacy of the reality is in a way taboo for Robert Lipsyte 29:32 So you're saying this is this is a safe show. Juan Sanchez 29:34 extremely safe Robert Lipsyte 29:35 you feel that way. George C. Wolfe 29:36 I think it's I think it's safe and I think it's incredibly dangerous because what it I think it's incredibly it's revealing if people can place their initial horror response, and about how they are receiving a personal and then look, I think it's very revealing about the society because the thought process that created this and the same thought process that created Webster on TV, I mean, it's still selling it's selling that mythology that that makes life somehow easier to take. So that therefore, yes, it's safe. But it's also it's an absolute Rosetta Stone for racism on a certain level. Robert Lipsyte 30:13 Well, tell us now who is it safe for and who is it dangerous for? George C. Wolfe 30:17 I think it's, it's safe for the people who really don't look. And I think it's dangerous for everybody who does the you know, because then what's dangerous is to have something exposed, you know, yourself or somebody who you're trying to deal with. And so that's where the danger is to me. I mean, that's what's sort of fascinating about it. You know, I want I want someone to say the dress where a lot of art, a lot of the art that was created by at this time by people of color was folk art. That was three clothespins, woven together, that I love that stuff, because that's where the truth is, that's where if you really want to get what was really going on, I think a lot of times in this period, you may not see it exclusively on these walls, but you will see it in folk art. You will see it in the work that the people made, you know, Robert Lipsyte 31:03 the people themselves, George C. Wolfe 31:04 the people themselves George Robert Lipsyte 31:05 George Wolfe, Jessica Hagedorn, Juan Sanchez, thank you very much. |
01:31:06 1866.38 |
Host Robert Lipsyte thanks guests. He encourages people to see the exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum, announces the show and introduces himself. Show end.
|
01:31:24 1884.41 |
Show credits run over paintings from the "Facing History" exhibition.
|
01:32:06 1926.84 |
Funding by announcer. Charitable orgs overlay The Eleventh Hour graphic.
|
01:33:41 2021.42 |
End Reel.
|
211 Third St, Greenport NY, 11944
[email protected]
631-477-9700
1-800-249-1940
Do you need help finding something that you need? Our team of professional librarians are on hand to assist in your search:
Be the first to finds out about new collections, buried treasures and place our footage is being used.
SubscribeShare this by emailing a copy of it to someone else. (They won’t need an account on the site to view it.)
Note! If you are looking to share this with an Historic Films researcher, click here instead.
Oops! Please note the following issues:
You need to sign in or create an account before you can contact a researcher.
Invoice # | Date | Status |
---|---|---|
|